Benefits of facial recognition technology and why it requires privacy laws
Many of you may have seen facial recognition technology in action before. Facebook uses it to suggest friends and law enforcement uses it to identify criminals. But as this technology becomes more widespread, there is a growing concern about privacy. After all, facial recognition data can be used to track our movements and even reveal our personal information. This is why we need strong privacy laws to protect us from the potential dangers of facial recognition. easy .
One of the main concerns of many about facial recognition technology is its potential for abuse. Users fear that governments and corporations may use this data to track our movements and monitor our activities. They could also use it to find personal information about us, such as our addresses and social media profiles. And if this data falls into the wrong hands, it could be used to exploit us or even steal our identities.
How does facial recognition technology work?
Facial recognition technology works by scanning a person’s facial features and then comparing them to a database of other facial scans. This can be used for things like identifying people at airports or in crowds or for authentication purposes, like logging into websites. The technical steps of this scan can be done with a regular photo or video camera and are sometimes supported with an infrared scan to measure depth variations for better results.
Image: China Images / Depositphotos
This is important, for example, so that no one can print a photo of someone else’s face to use to log in to their devices. The visual feed is aided by software that can then match it against files in a database or track people without associating the individual with a person in the file. This would be interesting to report data on the use and movement of spaces in which it does not matter who that person was. Body tracking would also suffice and you don’t necessarily need to calculate a person’s face.
How is biometric authentication used today?
Biometric authentication is the process of verifying an individual’s identity by measuring and analyzing their physical or behavioral characteristics. These characteristics can include facial features, fingerprints, voice patterns, and DNA. Biometric authentication is commonly used in today’s world to unlock phones, sign in to accounts, and verify identities.
Biometric authentication is becoming more and more common and is likely to be used in many more ways in the future. For example, facial recognition technology can be used to identify people as they walk down the street. This technology can be used for security purposes, such as identifying criminals or terrorists through CCTV. However, facial recognition technology can also be used for more benign purposes, such as identifying people who have forgotten their ID.
Image: Tbtb / Depositphotos
While facial recognition technology can be beneficial in some cases, it also raises privacy issues. For example, if facial recognition technology is used to identify people as they walk down the street, then it could be used to track the movements of innocent civilians. Also, if facial recognition technology is used to log into accounts, it could be used to access personal information.
Given the privacy concerns associated with facial recognition technology, it is important that laws are in place to protect people’s privacy. For example, the European Union has a law called the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) that regulates how facial recognition technology can be used . This law requires companies to obtain consent from individuals before using their facial data.
What are the privacy issues of facial recognition?
People who don’t want to use facial recognition technology have a number of privacy concerns. As briefly mentioned above, one concern is that the technology could be used to track your movements. Another concern is that technology could be used to identify them and collect information about them. Some people are also concerned that facial recognition technology could be used to hack into their accounts or steal their identities backed by VPN solutions or other technology that can change the way a digital system interprets your location.
Image: Pixinooo / Depositphotos
These are all valid concerns, and facial recognition technology has the potential to violate people’s privacy. However, many believe that facial recognition technology can also be used in a way that respects people’s privacy. For example, if companies only use facial recognition technology for authentication purposes (that is, to verify that you are who you say you are), people’s privacy would not be violated.
Beyond these risks, can earnings outweigh concerns?
Many people are very concerned about their privacy and have equally strong concerns, and are almost afraid of being tracked. This starts with people avoiding non-cash payments because they don’t want to share what they might be buying or where they went at what time. This expands to the possibility of being monitored by governments or companies through their smartphones physically and through their online history to assess behavioral patterns.
Some regions of the world ignored such concerns and introduced widespread surveillance networks, including camera feeds and software systems to add intelligence to recorded material. Depending on where you look, this could also involve facial recognition and tracking of your behavior. It’s like having a dedicated spy following you day and night and writing down everything you do and where you went.
Image: China Images / Depositphotos
My personal opinion on this is that my personal privacy and data is not that important. It’s not that valuable. I don’t want to stand in the way of such solutions because what they gain as a society is much more valuable to me. Police work is highly supported by such systems. If I’m robbed in a park right now, or anywhere really, I can tell the police, but they have almost no information to work with, and they’re unlikely to help me with the case.
If the robbery was on camera and if the thief was tracked the moment he left his house and towards me and back to his house or another hiding place, it would be a matter of minutes to solve the case. Ultimately this would probably help reduce crime as the risk of getting caught is so high that it is never a profitable business. Even a social credit scoring system doesn’t have to be all bad. It’s just a question of how it works and what the goals of that system are. What could be questionable if the systems are in place to protect and reward you?
Image: Candy18 / Depositphotos
You can take this further if you want. Not only is robbery a crime, but rape cases, road rage cases, and most other crimes would actually be much easier to solve and therefore likely to decrease. Terrorism works in different ways, but the intelligence obtained could also help prevent incidents from occurring. For me, I would prefer everyone to feel safe and be safer, and it would be nice if I shared my location or behavioral data to make this work. My privacy is worth no more than a safer society. Not in my books, at least, but certainly each person can have a different opinion on the matter.
While I am open to facial recognition technology being used to improve society or help us today, it is still clear that this requires well-designed technology policies and privacy laws that govern how data is captured, used and stored. Such laws should clearly define the full scope and include responsibilities and liabilities not only for individuals and governments, but also for companies that might build or operate these systems.
Without transparency of this and without awareness of the value to society, it is unlikely that a democratic region will be able to carry out such plans without the support of the people. It’s important to have these conversations and come up with a plan that works for everyone. Facial recognition technology can be a powerful tool to make our lives easier, but it must be done in a way that does not violate our privacy. Not in a way that we don’t agree with.